Skip to main content
This work is funded by people like you. Donate ↗

Section 1983 Cases the Plaintiff Won

25 cases in the library

Plaintiffs do win Section 1983 cases. These are the ones in this library where the court ruled for the plaintiff on the merits, reversed a dismissal, or let a jury verdict stand. Look at what the record contained and how the claims were framed. The pattern repeats: specific facts, one officer at a time, tied to an element.

Cases, newest first

Gonzalez v. Trevino

602 U.S. ___ (2024) · Jun 20, 2024

A plaintiff can use any objective evidence — not just strict comparator evidence — to show she was arrested when similarly situated individuals not engaged in the same protected speech had not been, thereby satisfying the narrow Nieves exception.

Thompson v. Clark

596 U.S. 36 (2022) · Apr 4, 2022

To bring a Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claim under Section 1983, a plaintiff need only show that the criminal prosecution ended without a conviction; the plaintiff does not have to show that the termination affirmatively indicated innocence.

Roque v. Harvel

993 F.3d 325 (5th Cir. 2021) · Apr 1, 2021

An officer was not entitled to qualified immunity where he shot and killed a suicidal man during a mental health crisis, because a jury could find the officer's continued firing after the initial shot was objectively unreasonable.

Sanchez v. Young County

956 F.3d 785 (5th Cir. 2020) · Apr 22, 2020

Summary judgment for the county on a conditions-of-confinement claim was reversed where evidence showed the jail had a persistent pattern of failing to complete mandatory intake screenings, and a pretrial detainee died of a drug overdose after jailers put her in a cell to 'sleep it off' without completing suicide screening or medical intake forms.

McDonough v. Smith

588 U.S. 109 (2019) · Jun 20, 2019

A Section 1983 claim that fabricated evidence was used against the plaintiff in a criminal proceeding, in violation of due process, does not accrue until the criminal proceedings terminate in the plaintiff's favor.

Brooks v. City of West Point, Mississippi

639 F. App'x 986 (5th Cir. 2016) · Feb 11, 2016

Officers were not entitled to qualified immunity on an excessive force claim where, viewing the facts in the plaintiff's favor, the plaintiff was grabbed, slammed against a garage door, and forced to the ground while not physically resisting, but were entitled to qualified immunity on the unlawful arrest claim where arguable probable cause existed for disorderly conduct.

Chacon v. Copeland

577 F. App'x 355 (5th Cir. 2014) · Aug 11, 2014

The district court properly denied qualified immunity to officers on excessive force claims where the plaintiff alleged he was beaten while compliant and not resisting arrest.

Wafer v. Molina

No. 3:14-CV-0976-M-BH (N.D. Tex. 2014) · Jun 13, 2014

Recommended dismissal of § 1983 false arrest and unlawful detention claims as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), holding that official-capacity claims against officers are treated as claims against the municipality, that police departments are not suable entities, and that a county jail is not a legal entity capable of being sued.

Tolan v. Cotton

572 U.S. 650 (2014) · May 5, 2014

Courts ruling on summary judgment must view the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party — the Fifth Circuit erred by crediting the officer's version of disputed facts when denying an excessive force claim.

Russell v. Altom

546 F. App'x 432 (5th Cir. 2013) · Oct 4, 2013

A grand jury indictment establishes probable cause sufficient to defeat both Fourth Amendment false arrest and First Amendment retaliation claims under § 1983, unless the plaintiff can show the grand jury's deliberations were tainted by law enforcement withholding relevant information.

Whitley v. Hanna

726 F.3d 631 (5th Cir. 2013) · Aug 12, 2013

Recognized that a Brady violation—withholding material exculpatory evidence—can support a § 1983 claim where the plaintiff can show the evidence was suppressed, it was favorable to the accused, and the suppression resulted in prejudice; reversed summary judgment for defendants on fabrication-of-evidence and Brady claims.

Barrios-Barrios v. Clipps

825 F. Supp. 2d 730 (E.D. La. 2011) · Oct 20, 2011

Section 1983 excessive force and unlawful detention claims arising from a police encounter in New Orleans; the court analyzed the claims under the Graham v. Connor objective reasonableness standard and addressed qualified immunity for the individual officers.

Raiche v. Pietroski

623 F.3d 30 (1st Cir. 2010) · Oct 25, 2010

The First Circuit held that a police officer who conducted an invasive strip search at a police station without reasonable suspicion that the arrestee was concealing weapons or contraband violated the Fourth Amendment, and that this right was clearly established — defeating qualified immunity.

Erickson v. Pardus

551 U.S. 89 (2007) · Jun 4, 2007

Rule 8(a)(2) requires only a short and plain statement of the claim, not specific facts, and a pro se complaint must be liberally construed and held to less stringent standards than a pleading drafted by a lawyer.

Scott v. Harris

550 U.S. 372 (2007) · Apr 30, 2007

When video evidence blatantly contradicts the plaintiff's version of events, courts need not adopt the plaintiff's account at summary judgment — and a police officer who rams a fleeing motorist's car to end a dangerous high-speed chase does not violate the Fourth Amendment.

Pineda v. City of Houston

291 F.3d 325 (5th Cir. 2002) · May 9, 2002

A municipality was not liable under Monell for an unconstitutional warrantless entry and fatal shooting by officers on a gang task force, where the plaintiffs failed to show a city policy or custom was the moving force behind the officers' decision to enter the home without a warrant.

Deorle v. Rutherford

272 F.3d 1272 (9th Cir. 2001) · Nov 19, 2001

A deputy sheriff who shot an unarmed, emotionally disturbed man in the face with a lead-filled beanbag round—without warning and while negotiators were en route—used excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment and was not entitled to qualified immunity, because no reasonable officer could have believed such force was lawful against a person who had committed no serious offense, posed no immediate threat, and had generally complied with police commands.

Brown v. Bryan County (On Remand)

219 F.3d 450 (5th Cir. 2000) · Jul 18, 2000

On remand from the Supreme Court's decision in Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown, the Fifth Circuit addressed whether the jury's verdict against the county could be sustained under the Supreme Court's heightened deliberate-indifference standard for single-hiring-decision municipal liability.

Priester v. City of Riviera Beach

208 F.3d 919 (11th Cir. 2000) · Apr 4, 2000

Police officers who ordered a K-9 to attack a compliant, non-threatening suspect who had surrendered with his hands up—and then stood by watching the dog maul him for two minutes—used excessive force and were not entitled to qualified immunity, even absent directly on-point case law, because the conduct was so obviously unconstitutional that no reasonable officer could believe it was permissible.

Benningfield v. City of Houston

157 F.3d 369 (5th Cir. 1998) · Oct 6, 1998

A plaintiff pursuing a municipal liability claim based on failure to train must demonstrate a pattern of similar violations to establish deliberate indifference, and a single incident of excessive force is generally insufficient to prove a municipal custom or policy.

Adams v. Metiva

31 F.3d 375 (6th Cir. 1994) · Aug 1, 1994

An officer who used excessive force during an arrest—including beating a suspect who was not resisting—was not entitled to qualified immunity, and the court established that the right to be free from excessive force during an arrest was clearly established in the Sixth Circuit, requiring a fact-intensive inquiry into the totality of the circumstances under Graham v. Connor.

Heck v. Humphrey

512 U.S. 477 (1994) · Jun 24, 1994

A § 1983 claim for damages is barred if success on that claim would necessarily imply the invalidity of an existing criminal conviction — the conviction must first be reversed or invalidated.

Presley v. City of Benbrook

4 F.3d 405 (5th Cir. 1993) · Oct 14, 1993

A jury's finding that officers' conduct was objectively unreasonable did not preclude a simultaneous finding that the officers were entitled to qualified immunity; the jury may decide disputed factual issues relating to immunity when properly instructed.

Pfannstiel v. City of Marion

918 F.2d 1178 (5th Cir. 1990) · Dec 12, 1990

Officers were not entitled to qualified immunity where genuine issues of material fact existed regarding whether they used excessive force and conducted unlawful searches during a confrontation with citizens in Marion, Texas.

City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.

453 U.S. 247 (1981) · Jun 26, 1981

A municipality is immune from punitive damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as neither the retributive nor deterrence objectives of punitive damages would be significantly advanced by holding municipalities liable for such damages.

Looking for something else? Use the filters on the full case library.

Have corrections or want to suggest a change?