Pro Se Primer
The legal terms you're most likely to encounter in a § 1983 case, explained like you're a human being — not a law student. Click any term to learn what it means, why it matters, and how courts actually use it.
Constitutional Law
Color of Law Acting with the authority of government — the threshold requirement for any § 1983 claim. Consent Search When you voluntarily agree to a police search, officers don't need a warrant — but the consent must be truly voluntary. Deadly Force Constitutional limits on when police can use lethal force — governed by the Fourth Amendment and the landmark case Tennessee v. Garner. Deprivation of Rights The core violation element of a § 1983 claim — you must show that an actual constitutional or federal right was taken from you. Eighth Amendment Protection against cruel and unusual punishment — applies to convicted prisoners, not pretrial detainees. Eleventh Amendment The constitutional bar on suing states in federal court — and why you sue officers and cities, not the state itself. Excessive Force When police use more force than the situation requires — analyzed under the Fourth Amendment's 'objective reasonableness' standard. Exigent Circumstances An exception to the warrant requirement that allows police to act without a warrant in genuine emergencies. False Arrest Arrest without probable cause — one of the most common § 1983 claims, analyzed under the Fourth Amendment. False Imprisonment Detention or confinement without legal authority — closely related to false arrest but can extend to any unlawful restraint on your liberty. First Amendment Retaliation When the government punishes you for exercising free speech — one of the strongest § 1983 claims if you can prove causation. Fourteenth Amendment Due process and equal protection — the constitutional amendments that extend civil rights protections to state government action. Fourth Amendment Your right against unreasonable searches and seizures — the constitutional basis for most police misconduct claims. Franks Violation A challenge to a search warrant based on material falsehoods or omissions in the officer's sworn affidavit, under Franks v. Delaware. Malicious Prosecution When police or prosecutors bring baseless charges to punish you — a Fourth Amendment claim after Thompson v. Clark. Plain View Doctrine An exception to the warrant requirement that lets officers seize obvious contraband or evidence already in plain view during a lawful intrusion. Pretrial Detention Being held in jail before trial — a Fourteenth Amendment seizure that generates some of the most common § 1983 claims. Probable Cause The level of evidence police need before they can arrest you or search your property. Reasonable Suspicion The lower standard that allows police to briefly stop and question you — less than probable cause, more than a hunch. Right to Record Police Your First Amendment right to film officers performing public duties — established in most circuits but still contested on the ground. Search Incident to Arrest A warrant exception allowing officers to search a person and the area within their immediate control after a lawful arrest. Seizure What counts as a 'seizure' under the Fourth Amendment — from brief police stops to full arrests, any significant restraint on your freedom of movement. State Action The requirement that a constitutional violation involve government conduct — not just private behavior. Warrant Requirement The Fourth Amendment generally requires police to obtain a warrant from a judge before conducting searches or seizures.
Qualified Immunity
Clearly Established Law The requirement that a prior case with similar enough facts must exist before an official can be held liable. Pearson v. Callahan The case that let courts skip the constitutional question and go straight to 'clearly established' — creating the QI ratchet. QI Reform The growing movement to abolish or reform qualified immunity — where it stands and who's fighting for change. Qualified Immunity The judge-made doctrine that shields government officials from liability unless the right they violated was 'clearly established.' Saucier Sequence The now-optional two-step QI analysis — decide the constitutional question first, then ask if the right was clearly established.
Statute
§ 1983 The federal statute that lets you sue government officials who violate your constitutional rights. § 1988 The fee-shifting companion to § 1983 — authorizes attorney fees for prevailing civil rights plaintiffs. Attorney Fees The fee-shifting statute that's supposed to make civil rights litigation viable — and why it often doesn't. PLRA The 1996 law designed to make it harder for prisoners to file civil rights suits — filing fees, exhaustion, and the physical injury requirement. Section 1985 The federal civil rights conspiracy statute — use it when two or more people conspired to violate your rights, but be warned: it requires proof of racial or class-based motivation.
Doctrine
§ 1983 Conspiracy When multiple government actors agree to violate your rights — hard to prove, but devastating when you can. Absolute Immunity Complete protection from § 1983 liability for judges, prosecutors, and legislators acting within their roles — no exceptions. Bivens Action The federal equivalent of § 1983 — for suing federal officials. Except the Supreme Court has been killing it for decades. Causation Every defendant in your § 1983 case must be personally connected to the specific constitutional violation — naming someone isn't enough. Collateral Estoppel When an issue decided in one case can't be relitigated in another — use a criminal suppression ruling to lock in facts for your civil case. Custom A widespread, persistent practice by government employees that, although not formally authorized, is so common it effectively has the force of policy for Monell liability. Deliberate Indifference When a government official knows about a serious risk and does nothing — the standard for Fourteenth Amendment and Monell claims. Ex Parte Young A legal doctrine that allows you to sue state officials in federal court for injunctive relief, even though the state itself is immune from suit. Failure to Intervene When an officer watches another officer violate your rights and does nothing — they're liable too. Failure to Supervise A claim that a supervisor's or municipality's inadequate oversight of officers led to constitutional violations — requires deliberate indifference. Failure to Train A city can be liable under § 1983 when its failure to train employees amounts to deliberate indifference to constitutional rights. Favorable Termination For certain § 1983 claims, your underlying criminal case must have ended in your favor before you can sue. Final Policymaker The person whose decisions can bind the municipality — required to establish Monell liability through a single decision. Graham Factors The three-factor test courts use to evaluate whether police force was 'reasonable' — severity of crime, immediate threat, and resistance. Heck Doctrine The rule that you can't sue under § 1983 if winning would imply your criminal conviction was invalid — unless it's been overturned first. Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine A legal rule that says employees of the same organization can't 'conspire' with each other — and a major obstacle when suing multiple officers from the same department. Judicial Immunity Why you can't sue the judge — even when the judge is wrong, biased, or acting outrageously. Monell Liability How to sue a city or county — and why it's harder than suing the officer who actually hurt you. Moving Force Causation To hold a city liable under § 1983, you must prove its policy or custom was the 'moving force' that actually caused the constitutional violation. Municipal Indemnification Why the officer almost never pays — cities cover the tab for 99%+ of police misconduct judgments. Municipal Liability The complete framework for holding cities and counties accountable — policy, custom, policymaker, failure to train. Personal Participation In a § 1983 case you must show each defendant was personally involved in violating your rights — you can't sue someone just because they're a supervisor. Prosecutorial Immunity Why you can almost never sue the prosecutor who wrongfully charged you — and the narrow exceptions. Proximate Cause The legal requirement that the defendant's conduct was a foreseeable, direct cause of your harm — not just a remote or coincidental link. Ratification A municipality can be liable under § 1983 when a final policymaker approves or ratifies an employee's unconstitutional conduct after the fact. Respondeat Superior The employer-liability doctrine that works everywhere except § 1983 — where cities aren't automatically liable for their officers. Rooker-Feldman Doctrine You can't use a federal § 1983 case to appeal a state court decision you lost — the federal court will throw it out. Sovereign Immunity The doctrine that governments cannot be sued without their consent — and how it affects § 1983 claims against states. State of Mind Different § 1983 claims require different levels of intent — some need only unreasonableness, others need deliberate indifference or intent to shock the conscience. Substantive Due Process The doctrine that some government conduct is so outrageous no process can justify it — the 'shocks the conscience' standard. Supervisory Liability How to hold the chief, sergeant, or commander liable — not for what the officer did, but for what the supervisor allowed. Witness Immunity Officers who lie under oath are immune from your § 1983 suit for their testimony — even if it's perjury. Younger Abstention If you have a pending state criminal case, the federal court will almost certainly refuse to hear your § 1983 case until it's over — a trap that catches many pro se plaintiffs.
Procedure
Accrual The moment the statute of limitations clock starts ticking on your § 1983 claim — usually when you know (or should know) you were injured. Affirmative Defenses Legal defenses that the defendant must raise and prove — including qualified immunity, statute of limitations, and others that can defeat your claim even if the facts are on your side. Amended Complaint Your second (or third) shot at getting the complaint right — when and how to fix your pleading after filing. Answer The defendant's formal response to your complaint — admitting, denying, or claiming ignorance of each allegation. Binding Precedent A court decision that other courts must follow — understanding which cases control in your state is critical to building your argument. Class Action Suing on behalf of a group of people who suffered the same constitutional violation — powerful but hard to certify. Collateral Order Doctrine The exception that allows appeals before a case ends — the legal basis for interlocutory QI appeals. Demand Letter A pre-suit letter demanding compensation — not required, but it can lead to settlement without filing. Deposition Live, under-oath testimony before trial — your chance to pin down the officer's story and catch contradictions. Discovery The phase where both sides exchange evidence — your best chance to find the proof you need, and where defendants try hardest to stonewall. Exhaustion of Remedies Whether you need to go through state or administrative channels before filing a § 1983 suit — usually no, with one big exception. Federal Circuit Courts The 13 federal appeals courts that sit between trial courts and the Supreme Court — their decisions control the law in your state. Federal Jurisdiction Why § 1983 cases go to federal court — and when they can also be filed in state court. In Forma Pauperis Filing without paying the fee — how to get into federal court when you can't afford the $405 filing fee. Individual Capacity Suing the officer personally — the path to money damages, but also where qualified immunity lives. Injury in Fact A concrete, particularized harm that you actually suffered — the threshold requirement for standing to bring a federal lawsuit. Interlocutory Appeal An appeal before the case is over — the rare exception to the final judgment rule, and how QI denials go up immediately. Interrogatories Written questions the other side must answer under oath — limited to 25 in federal court, so make them count. Mootness A case becomes moot when there is no longer a live controversy for the court to resolve. Motion to Compel When the other side won't turn over evidence — how you ask the court to force them. Motion to Dismiss The defendant's first attack — arguing your complaint fails to state a claim, before any evidence is exchanged. Official Capacity Suing the officer 'as the government' — good for injunctions, useless for money damages against state officials. PACER The federal court system's online database where you can look up case filings, dockets, and court records — essential for researching similar cases and monitoring your own. Plausibility Pleading The Supreme Court standard requiring complaints to allege facts that make your claims 'plausible' — not just possible. Pro Se Representing yourself in court — what it means, what courts expect, and the 'liberal construction' that helps less than you'd think. Protective Order A court order limiting what can be shared from discovery — often used by defendants to hide embarrassing evidence. Proving Damages Winning on liability means nothing if you can't prove what the violation cost you — medical bills, lost wages, emotional harm, and more all need evidence. Remand The process of sending a removed case back from federal court to state court when removal was improper. Removal The process by which a defendant moves a § 1983 case from state court to federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Requests for Admission Force the other side to admit or deny specific facts — anything not denied within 30 days is deemed admitted. Requests for Production Demanding documents, videos, emails, and other evidence from the other side — the backbone of discovery in police misconduct cases. Rule 26(f) Conference The mandatory meeting with opposing counsel to plan discovery — happens early and sets the tone for the entire case. Scheduling Order The court's timeline for your case — discovery deadlines, motion cutoffs, and trial dates that govern everything. Service of Process Officially delivering the lawsuit to the defendant — mess it up and your case can be dismissed. Settlement How most § 1983 cases end — and what to watch out for in settlement agreements. Standing The constitutional requirement that you must have a real, concrete injury to bring a § 1983 case in federal court. Statute of Limitations The deadline to file your case — miss it and your claim is dead, no matter how strong it is. Summary Judgment The defendant's second major attack — arguing they should win without a trial because there's no genuine dispute of material fact. Supplemental Jurisdiction How to bring your state law claims along for the ride in federal court — and the risk of them getting kicked back. Terry Stop A brief investigative detention based on reasonable suspicion — less than an arrest, but still a seizure. Tolling When the statute of limitations clock pauses — minority, disability, concealment, or other grounds that buy you more time. Venue The rules that determine which federal court district is the right place to file your § 1983 lawsuit.
Evidence
Body Camera Footage The most powerful evidence in a police misconduct case — if it exists, if it wasn't 'accidentally' deleted, and if you can get it. Brady Violation When prosecutors hide evidence that could help you — a due process violation that's nearly impossible to remedy. Expert Witness Specialists who testify about police training, use of force, or medical injuries — expensive but sometimes essential. Spoliation Destruction or loss of evidence — and the sanctions courts can impose when the other side destroys what you need.
Remedies
Compensatory Damages Money to make you whole — medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and emotional distress. Consent Decree A court-enforced agreement to reform a police department — the most powerful systemic remedy in civil rights law. Declaratory Judgment A court ruling that declares your rights — establishing that the government violated the Constitution, even without damages. Injunctive Relief A court order requiring the government to do something or stop doing something — the path to systemic change. Irreparable Harm Harm that money damages alone cannot fix — a required showing for obtaining injunctive relief like a TRO or preliminary injunction. Nominal Damages A symbolic $1 award that proves a constitutional violation happened — but may leave you paying your own attorney fees. Preliminary Injunction Emergency court orders to stop unconstitutional conduct before your case is fully decided. Punitive Damages Extra damages meant to punish — available against individual officers but not municipalities. TRO An emergency court order that temporarily stops someone from doing something harmful — the fastest form of injunctive relief, lasting only days to weeks.
Have corrections or want to suggest a change? Let us know ↗