Skip to main content
This work is funded by people like you. Donate ↗
Doctrine

Sovereign Immunity

The doctrine that governments cannot be sued without their consent — and how it affects § 1983 claims against states.

What It Is

Sovereign immunity is the ancient legal principle that the government cannot be sued without its consent. In the United States, this doctrine primarily protects states (not cities or counties) from being hauled into court.

The Eleventh Amendment enshrines this protection in the Constitution, barring lawsuits against a state in federal court by its own citizens or citizens of other states.

How It Affects § 1983 Cases

Sovereign immunity has a major impact:

The Workarounds

You cannot sue a state for damages under § 1983, but you have options:

  1. Sue the individual officer in their personal capacity for damages. Sovereign immunity does not protect individuals acting on their own behalf.
  2. Sue a state official in official capacity for injunctive relief under the Ex parte Young doctrine. You can ask a court to order a state official to stop violating the Constitution going forward.
  3. Sue the city or county under Monell liability if a municipal policy or custom caused the violation.

Congress and Sovereign Immunity

Congress can override sovereign immunity in limited circumstances by using its power under the Fourteenth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court held that § 1983 itself does not abrogate state sovereign immunity. Quern v. Jordan, 440 U.S. 332 (1979).

Practical Tips

Key Takeaway

States are immune from § 1983 damages suits. Focus your claims on individual officers (personal capacity) and municipalities, or seek injunctive relief against state officials under Ex parte Young.

Have corrections or want to suggest a change? Let us know ↗