Skip to main content
This work is funded by people like you. Donate β†—
Doctrine

Ex Parte Young

A legal doctrine that allows you to sue state officials in federal court for injunctive relief, even though the state itself is immune from suit.

What It Is

The Ex parte Young doctrine is a critical workaround to sovereign immunity. Under Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), the Supreme Court held that when a state official violates the Constitution, they are β€œstripped” of their official character and can be sued in federal court for prospective (forward-looking) injunctive relief.

The legal fiction: you are not suing the state β€” you are suing an individual who happens to be a state officer and is acting unconstitutionally.

How It Works

To use Ex parte Young, your lawsuit must:

  1. Name a state official (not the state itself) as the defendant
  2. Sue them in their official capacity
  3. Seek prospective relief β€” an injunction ordering the official to stop the ongoing constitutional violation or comply with the law going forward
  4. Allege an ongoing violation of federal law

You cannot use Ex parte Young to get money damages for past harm. That is still blocked by the Eleventh Amendment. The doctrine only opens the door to forward-looking relief.

Key Cases

When It Applies in Β§ 1983 Cases

Ex parte Young is most useful when:

Practical Tips

Key Takeaway

Ex parte Young lets you get a federal court order stopping a state official from violating your constitutional rights β€” even though you can’t sue the state itself for damages.

Have corrections or want to suggest a change? Let us know β†—