Report and Recommendation (R&R)
The magistrate judge's written proposal for how the district judge should rule on a motion to dismiss or summary judgment. You have 14 days to object, and unobjected findings are very hard to appeal.
What It Is
A report and recommendation, usually called an R&R or, in some districts, βfindings, conclusions, and recommendation,β is the magistrate judgeβs written proposal on a dispositive motion. It reads like an opinion. It states the facts as the magistrate judge understood them, applies the law, and recommends a result: grant the motion to dismiss, deny it in part, grant summary judgment, and so on.
The R&R is not a final ruling. The district judge decides whether to adopt it. 28 U.S.C. Β§ 636(b)(1)(C).
The 14-Day Clock
You have 14 days from service of the R&R to file written objections. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). If the R&R was served on you by mail, add 3 days. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). The other side then has 14 days to respond to your objections.
Calendar the deadline the day the R&R arrives. If you need more time, ask for it before the deadline runs.
What Happens If You Do Not Object
The district judge reviews only the parts you objected to under the fresh, de novo standard. Everything else is reviewed, at most, for clear error, and most district judges simply adopt it.
Worse, a failure to object can waive your right to appeal the point. In Thomas v. Arn, the Supreme Court upheld a circuit rule that treats an unobjected R&R finding as forfeited on appeal. The Fifth Circuit, like most circuits, limits appellate review of unobjected findings to plain error, which almost never succeeds.
What a Good Objection Looks Like
General objections do not count. βPlaintiff objects to the entire R&Rβ preserves nothing. Each objection must:
- point to a specific finding or conclusion, by page and section of the R&R
- explain what is wrong, using the record that was before the magistrate judge and the controlling law
- state the result the district judge should reach instead
New arguments and new evidence raised for the first time in objections are usually refused. Argue from the record you already built.
Why It Matters in a Section 1983 Case
In districts that refer all pro se cases to magistrate judges, the R&R on the motion to dismiss is where most Section 1983 cases end. The objection is your only chance to have a district judge look at the qualified immunity analysis with fresh eyes. See the process step on responding to a report and recommendation for the full walkthrough.
Key Authority
- 28 U.S.C. Β§ 636(b)(1) β referral, objections, and de novo review
- Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) β dispositive motions and objection procedure
- Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d) β three added days for mail service
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985) β waiver rules for unobjected findings
Related Terms
Articles Using This Term
How to Sue the Police: The Section 1983 Guide
How a lawsuit against police works under 42 U.S.C. Β§ 1983, from the rights you can sue over and who you can name, through the complaint, the motion to dismiss, discovery, and trial. Written for people doing it without a lawyer, with honest odds.
Red-Team Your Own Filing Before You File It
A checklist for attacking your own Section 1983 complaint, response, or objection the way defense counsel will, sorting what you find into five buckets, and deciding what to fix, narrow, or leave alone.
What Do I File, and By When? A Section 1983 Deadline Map
One table that maps every common docket event in a Section 1983 case to the document you file in response and the federal deadline for filing it.